Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zizou Bergs vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 0 Nijboer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 52.17% of points on their second serve, while Nijboer has won 49.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 50.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.44% and 35.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 60.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 51.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 67.57% of matches played (W/L 50/ 24), with Nijboer winning 62.22% (W/L 56/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 30/ 10), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.35% of matches (W/L 43/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bergs winning 1 times and Nijboer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bergs winning 2 and Nijboer winning 1. The last match between Bergs and Nijboer was at the M25 Sunderland, 09-04-2019, First, I.hard with Zizou Bergs getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bergs winning 1 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.09 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 189.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 41.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 45.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
104
Rank
102
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
433
Rank
428
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
63% (284-168)
Career Total W/L
57% (222-170)
69% (27-12)
YTD W/L
56% (20-16)
$563,835
Career Prize Money
$5,735
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (59/87) | 64% (58/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (42/59) | 52% (30/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 50% (16/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (44/90) | 38% (33/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ryan Nijboer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (27/12) | 56% (20/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (64/35) | 57% (47/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (504/431) | 53% (409/369) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 81% (17/4) | 55% (12/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 292 | 126 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 125 | 143 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:33 | 1:48:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 309.03 | 230.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1778/2890) | 59% (1433/2429) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1302/1778) | 69% (982/1433) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (578/1112) | 49% (493/996) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (119/289) | 44% (125/281) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1172/2953) | 42% (1045/2497) |
| Slam W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 47% (9/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (24/34) | 56% (20/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 85% (11/13) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (28/22) | 78% (23/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (28/6) | 22% (23/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 15% (13/2) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Maximilian Marterer
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
71%
(
100 of
141)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
125)
15
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
62 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
140
Total Points Won
126
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mathias Bourgue
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Joris De Loore
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Zizou Bergs
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
George Goldhoff
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Laurent Lokoli
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bergs Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
